Interesting, sounds hard but question about one part: > rather I think it would be useful as a tool to be configurable against the sources that the reader trus

Interesting, sounds hard but question about one part: > rather I think it would be useful as a tool to be configurable against the sources that the reader trusts or a set of sources backed by an organization the reader trusts. What if the only sources they trust are QAnon people or something? It seems like your way would just reinforce bubbles. I may have an alternative. What if organizations had an epistemological policy similar to a privacy policy? I think it woild be fine for them to be opiniinated about what sources they choose as long as it is not allowed to be arbitrarily varying, is communicated clearly and content is verifiable against it.