4 ms·
> Does that make it more clear why that phrasing should be called out? You have successfully obscured the issue even further by introducing the irrelevant fact
by Igelau 5y ago
> Does that make it more clear why that phrasing should be called out?
You have successfully obscured the issue even further by introducing the irrelevant factor of race.
> sloppy reasoning and other prejudices should be resisted whenever they are encountered
Providing an excellent example in the process. If I seem as confused to you as you do to me, then maybe we have found some common ground.
- KMag 5y ago> You have successfully obscured the issue even further by introducing the irrelevant factor of race. I substituted one protected class for another, where it's more commonly seen as a necessary protected class. This is a pretty common device to illustrate bias in language. Are you arguing that it's fine to make your statement about a generation, but not about a race? If so, why?