2 ms·

I think you missed the point which wasn't to express offense but to disagree based on differential priorities. It's a Maslow's hierarchy of needs thing: if lowe

I think you missed the point which wasn't to express offense but to disagree based on differential priorities. It's a Maslow's hierarchy of needs thing: if lower needs are not meet, some of the advice would be detrimental if followed. I think it's a fair criticism when the audience is not delinieated like it isn't in the OP.

Baeocystin 6y ago
For what it's worth, yours is the interpretation I was going for.
biren34 6y ago
The comment was that the points about money "are, frankly, insulting". I'd call yours a radical interpretation of the text.
- guerrilla 6y ago
  Well, it's apparently the correct interpretation according to the author (see sibling comment.) I don't think expressing sentiment in addition to the point makes that sentiment the point.
  - biren34 6y ago
    Fair enough.