47 ms·
I don't disagree (and nor am I certain you are right), but if that is so, then there are some follow-on issues: 1) The system still has to react safely to pede
by mannykannot 6y ago
I don't disagree (and nor am I certain you are right), but if that is so, then there are some follow-on issues:
1) The system still has to react safely to pedestrians, cyclists and other entities outside of the network.
1.1) During the transition period, that is going to include vehicles driven by people (I do not think it will be feasible to ban the latter before self-driving vehicles are commonplace, except possibly in city centers and on some major highways.)
2) We do not want systems to learn how to take advantage of the protocol to drive aggressively and antisocially.
- ehnto 6y agoI wonder if the software industry has it in itself to produce a safe intra-vehicle network that wouldn't be taken advantage of, either by malicious actors or the manufacturers. I am sure there is a technically sound protocol someone can come up with, but it would have to survive the corporate food chain, proprietary advances, and the three letter agencies.
- totetsu 6y agoWould we see the same dynamic we are seeing now with "net neutrality" and fast lanes for certain endpoints? Like if you pay for a premium service included in the BMW package, you get to travel at full speed, while the test of the vehicles are artificially slowed down. Or if you are on your way to Disney land with a paid ticket, all the stop lights will change in your favor.
- virtue3 6y agoThankfully BMW doesn't own the roads. They do this in LA already, you can choose to be toll'd more (wireless tolls) or you can stay in the normal lanes. I'm much more ok with the regional infrastructure charging it because you have at least a chance at knowing where the money goes. The car manufacturers would love to have some sort of residual billing for crap like that I'm sure tho.
- ehnto 6y agoPlenty of places have privatized toll roads, in which case a private company owns the toll road and there's nothing (currently) stopping the owner from giving a special pass to particular car owners. BMW could partner with the toll road company to give free passage to BMW owners as an example. The fact that it doesn't currently happen is a good sign, but as corporations grab hold of society in more ways I don't see why a premium car company wouldn't try to differentiate with those kinds of benefits. As cars become more like a service provided than an object you own, it makes sense that those kinds of things would spice up a particular "package deal" for your car service.