3 ms·
> Just trying to hit enough milestones to get scooped up by somebody bigger. A few years back, during the peak of the self-driving hype cycle, I considered doi
by jtolmar 5y ago
> Just trying to hit enough milestones to get scooped up by somebody bigger.
A few years back, during the peak of the self-driving hype cycle, I considered doing exactly this. I think with a small team of sensor and Bayes filter experts, a car outfitted with expensive but off-the-shelf sensors, and about a year of dev time, you could get a car that self pilots 95% of the time on a wide suburban road in clear conditions. That extra 5%, other road types, and worse visibility conditions would each take you far more effort than that. But if your goal was just to show results fast and get acquired, it'd be easy to convince people you were almost there.
> A roadway can be MUCH smarter than a car.
If we're building specialized roadways, you can steer a vehicle with two strips of metal tied together by wooden boards. And it can travel twice as fast as a car while holding a hundred times the passengers. And it was invented 200 years ago.
- Ericson2314 5y ago> At best, I think, we decrease emissions associated with them. Amen to that. It just shows how crappy our economy is that we don't have trains, pneumatic tubes, and other old school technology that hasn't been beat everywhere.