4 ms·
Yeah, also maybe some ownership to, to most reading wikipedia it appears as a data source that all comes from an unknown source. Sure you can dig a bit and see
by robryan 15y ago
Yeah, also maybe some ownership to, to most reading wikipedia it appears as a data source that all comes from an unknown source. Sure you can dig a bit and see who added what to each article, but maybe it would be good to list contributors, especially if something is primarily the effort of one person somewhere prominent in the articles.
- philwelch 15y agoOne of the central tenets of Wikipedia is that there is no ownership. This is intended to mean that no editor had any authority over any other editor when it came to article content, and anything like what you're suggesting would conflict with that.