3 ms·
FWIW, I downvoted you for the grossly unjustified implication that this sort of unconscionable malfeasance on the part of school administrators is in any way "s
by a1369209993 6y ago
FWIW, I downvoted you for the grossly unjustified implication that this sort of unconscionable malfeasance on the part of school administrators is in any way "shocking", unbelieveable, or specific to "lead-contaminated Boomer"s, rather than a predictable result of putting small-minded fascistic pricks (of any generation) in that sort of position of authority.
- Igelau 6y agoNoted. Next factor in: [1] the fascistic pricks of my generation (who are still most of today's fascistic pricks) happen to be what I said they were, and [2] I never said all Boomers were lead-contaminated or that this was historically unique to only them. Now we don't even disagree on semantics.
- a1369209993 6y ago> Now we don't even disagree on semantics. Yes, we do. > > > That's what shocked me about this. I can't believe how doggedly the schoolboard pursued this We agree that it's bad, but it isn't surprising. > I never said [...] that this was historically unique to only [Boomers]. > > > (anyone who isn't [both] lead-contaminated [and a] Boomer)[superset] would just shrug and walk away. > > > (anyone who isn't a Boomer)[subset] would just shrug and walk away Yes, you did.
- Igelau 6y agoI can't even read your butchering of my words for all the bracketing. You call it implication born between my words, but I call it interpretation born between your ears. What it's confessing, I have no idea.