4 ms·

> You're a self described growth hacker I don't describe myself as a "growth hacker" anywhere that I'm aware of. > don't be surprised when a bunch of aspiring

> You're a self described growth hacker I don't describe myself as a "growth hacker" anywhere that I'm aware of. > don't be surprised when a bunch of aspiring hackers/techies get annoyed when they see people who do bend the rules to their gain (financial or otherwise) despite having access to the worlds most prominent investors (read -> resources) and seemingly don't do their homework. Not everything is so black and white. What is more likely is that some lawyer gave an opinion that Lambda School's offering could be interpreted as an educational loan and qualify as such (pretty clearly actually, given that the contract was written by a lawyer), and maybe even said that if they got sued here the remedy would likely be to just clarify the definition. > Like does Lambda not have access to Wilson Sonsini lawyers like the rest of their cohort? YC has in-house legal counsel now, and Lambda is an old enough company to have their own counsel. In any case, obviously a lawyer wrote the contract and gave an opinion that doesn't agree with your own expert legal opinion. > Move fast and break things am I right? Hopefully! We need a lot more of that in the world. More Zuckerbergs, more Travis Kalaniks. The more the better.

mbesto 5y ago
> I don't describe myself as a "growth hacker" anywhere that I'm aware of. Sorry, growth consultant. Maybe it's fair to say the two are interchangeable, maybe not. I'd at least assume the same when someone uses the word growth instead of revenue/sales/marketing. Might help to not pontificate about what the term "growth hacking" is if you don't want to be associated with it: https://jamiequint.substack.com/p/growth-hacking-a-primer https://jamiequint.substack.com/p/growth-hacking-a-primer > In any case, obviously a lawyer wrote the contract and gave an opinion that doesn't agree with your own expert legal opinion. Where did I give my legal opinion? The fact is they had to settle to "undergo a review of its marketing materials to ensure that the information is accurate". This case wasn't about some doubt about legalese, but rather about how they presented themselves, hence the word "deception". It doesn't take a lawyer to know what that word means. > More Zuckerbergs, more Travis Kalaniks. The more the better. I think you'll understand why people are being critical of you now.
effingwewt 5y ago
Ok I wasn't sure before but now you must be trolling, I don't think anyone honestly believes that >Hopefully! We need a lot more of that in the world. More Zuckerbergs, more Travis Kalaniks. The more the better. Austen's responses and your inane defense of this is the susan wojcicki giving herself an award for censorship while calling it freedom of expression. Businesses wishing words into different meanings is becoming rampant.

mbesto 5y ago

> I don't describe myself as a "growth hacker" anywhere that I'm aware of. Sorry, growth consultant. Maybe it's fair to say the two are interchangeable, maybe not. I'd at least assume the same when someone uses the word growth instead of revenue/sales/marketing. Might help to not pontificate about what the term "growth hacking" is if you don't want to be associated with it: https://jamiequint.substack.com/p/growth-hacking-a-primer https://jamiequint.substack.com/p/growth-hacking-a-primer > In any case, obviously a lawyer wrote the contract and gave an opinion that doesn't agree with your own expert legal opinion. Where did I give my legal opinion? The fact is they had to settle to "undergo a review of its marketing materials to ensure that the information is accurate". This case wasn't about some doubt about legalese, but rather about how they presented themselves, hence the word "deception". It doesn't take a lawyer to know what that word means. > More Zuckerbergs, more Travis Kalaniks. The more the better. I think you'll understand why people are being critical of you now.

effingwewt 5y ago

Ok I wasn't sure before but now you must be trolling, I don't think anyone honestly believes that >Hopefully! We need a lot more of that in the world. More Zuckerbergs, more Travis Kalaniks. The more the better. Austen's responses and your inane defense of this is the susan wojcicki giving herself an award for censorship while calling it freedom of expression. Businesses wishing words into different meanings is becoming rampant.