All of those examples could be invalidated with new information. As inconvenient as it may be, truth is transitory and progress toward it is frequently made th

All of those examples could be invalidated with new information. As inconvenient as it may be, truth is transitory and progress toward it is frequently made through invalidation. It's more prudent and useful to assume facts don't exist. As for "fact-checkers", who fact-checks them? (Etc...) The notion of visiting a webpage authored by God-knows-who to check whether what's on another webpage authored by God-knows-who is correct or not is absurd. And we haven't even gotten into subjectivity or nuance.