3 ms·
>"When I worked in a studio, we would mix on $8k genelec monitors, some cheaper monitors, and also test the mix in our cars and on our phones." Yes! When i was
by genewitch 6y ago
>"When I worked in a studio, we would mix on $8k genelec monitors, some cheaper monitors, and also test the mix in our cars and on our phones."
Yes! When i was producing an album a year, i'd write in monitor headphones, master on bookshelf monitors + a smallish subwoofer, then computer speakers, my car stereo, and a friend's street comp A car stereo. It's the only way to be sure that my ears in the "studio" weren't being biased by the overall quality of the sound damping and accoustics of the room.
And objectively, i know that CDs are "pure". I also really can't hear the difference between a mastered 96khz 24 bit raw audio file, FLAC, or ~300ABR Mp3. And before it's mentioned, i have much better hearing than anyone i know, even if i have lost the ability to distinguish words when someone talks to me off-axis. the other night i heard my nearest neighbor playing music, and no one else could, here. Neighbor is like 1/4 mile away, from inside their house to inside my house. I brought my tascam to the back door and recorded[0]. Sure enough, the recording has a high noise floor but you can see the bass hits.
I still prefer live electronica shows where the DJ has pennies taped to their stylus, but i watch DJs on twitch using laptops and DJ-I digital turntables. All this to say, i've never made fun of someone spending thousands on pre-amps, amps, speakers, decks, whatever. If someone likes the way a Marantz sounds, or a Pioneer, or JBL or klipsch speakers - it doesn't affect me at all.
We're not using skippy CD players and realaudio/56kbit mp3s anymore!
- seba_dos1 6y ago> I also really can't hear the difference between a mastered 96khz 24 bit raw audio file, FLAC, or ~300ABR Mp3 An MP3 file at around 300kbps should be pretty much indistinguishable from FLAC for a human, so that's not surprising at all :) The reason why I keep my music library as FLAC is not because it sounds better - it's because it's a perfect lossless copy of the original source that can be encoded to something lossy should a need arise. If I had to make 128kbps Opus files for some mobile use case, I'd rather do that from FLACs than MP3s. It also avoids double lossy compression when using things like A2DP.