I'm trying to figure out a litmus test on how the content of what is said could make this justified or not. Like if a football player got on snapchat and said

I'm trying to figure out a litmus test on how the content of what is said could make this justified or not. Like if a football player got on snapchat and said that they hope they lose the game this coming Friday and that they intended to take actions that undermined the team, would they be justified in being kicked off the team? I think so. Is there a similar line for cheerleading and did this cross it? I don't think so, but it's hard to say for sure. I don't know if it's possible to make a ruling that simultaneously defends the cheerleader's speech without also preventing the football coach from acting in this hypothetical situation.