3 ms·
Yes I read the article, but I was replying to your comment, not the article’s argument. I replied to that directly in another comment. You seemed to be arguing
by keiferski 6y ago
Yes I read the article, but I was replying to your comment, not the article’s argument. I replied to that directly in another comment.
You seemed to be arguing for censorship, which is what I was replying to.
- toss1 6y agoPlease read more carefully I am absolutely not arguing for censorship, especially since censorship creates it's own blowback, which is often even more helpful to the disinformation. I am merely arguing that disinformation needs to be fought, especially actively weaponized disinformation. It looks like this contextualization could be a very good method.