3 ms·
or you could just use flexbox to do the exact same thing and have a superset of that extremely broad support, including ie11 without having to rely on any kind
by asddubs 6y ago
or you could just use flexbox to do the exact same thing and have a superset of that extremely broad support, including ie11 without having to rely on any kind of magic.
https://caniuse.com/flexbox https://caniuse.com/flexbox
I do use grid when I need it, but I don't see the point of using grid in places where flexbox will do. Granted this is on the verge of not mattering at all anymore, but I just don't see the point in using something less compatible when you don't have to.
- schwartzworld 6y agoI want to learn grid, and I keep waiting to be given a layout I can't implement in flexbox as an excuse. It's been years of waiting through multiple jobs.
- sodapopcan 6y agoI like grid because it eliminates the need for any elements that exist purely for layout. This makes markup cleaner which makes it easier to change in the future. But as I stated in elsewhere in this thread, grid is not a replacement for flexbox. There is overlap, they both have their strengths.
- asddubs 6y agothe one thing i couldn't do with flexbox where I had to use grid was a sidebar that was being rearranged responsively, part of it below the main content, and part of it above. but yeah, most of the time flexbox + order can get you quite far