4 ms·
> It was expressed privately That's immaterial. The teams rules prohibited any statements of that nature, in private or public. The real question is whether s
by tantalor 6y ago
> It was expressed privately
That's immaterial. The teams rules prohibited any statements of that nature, in private or public.
The real question is whether such a rule is enforceable. If not, then every rule would have a limited scope. The article gives some examples of problems this would cause, e.g., sharing test answers, bullying, harassment.
If the rules only apply while on school property or in public, then why even have rules? The student can just flaunt the rules and claim "privacy" when challenged.
- bluefirebrand 6y agoOf course every rule should have a limited scope. Institutions absolutely should not be allowed to have any say about what you do outside of their actual purview (ie: off of their property, not during work hours, while not representing them, etc). Almost any way that Institutions have to detect rule breaking outside of their purview involves serious privacy breaches.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]