3 ms·
>Apparently you didn't bother to fully read their comment, or even look at the page. Was there a need for this attitude (which, by the way, violates HN guideli
by dTal 6y ago
>Apparently you didn't bother to fully read their comment, or even look at the page.
Was there a need for this attitude (which, by the way, violates HN guidelines)?
I was looking, not unreasonably, at the linked page. I see that indeed the first example on the "Examples" page exhibits this wobble - thanks to user jmiskovic who was actually helpful.
- craftinator 6y agoI'll direct you to my second response to you, where I point out why it appeared from what you wrote that you either hadn't read the original comment fully, or had not examined the subject of that comment. I believe pointing this out was not a violation of HN guidelines, while your negative attitude in multiple comments since then is most definitely in violation. As far as being helpful, I don't think your first comment falls into that category either.
- pengaru 6y agowrite a song about it