5 ms·
Agreed. If anything, this study makes the case that one person with sweeping decision power is at best a liability.
by rybosworld 6y ago
Agreed. If anything, this study makes the case that one person with sweeping decision power is at best a liability.
- koonsolo 6y agoIn that case, take away the CEO and see what happens. It can't be that hard. You don't know any companies without CEO's? Exactly!
- rybosworld 6y agoA famous one is DPR Construction: https://www.dpr.com/media/blog/wsj-ceo https://www.dpr.com/media/blog/wsj-ceo They have 3 people (the co-founders) sharing the role/responsibilities of CEO.
- koonsolo 6y agoStrange reasoning: "Show me a person without a car". "Here you go, this person has 3". So 3 founders are running the company, nothing special about that. Please show me a company without a CEO.
- gtyras2mrs 6y agoDoesn't seem like 'strange reasoning' at all. Since the comment was like 'having only 1 driver is likely to be a liability', to which you responded 'show me a vehicle with no drivers' and you got a response saying 'this vehicle has 3 drivers' The strange reasoning is taking the the statement that said "just one driver could be a liability" and asking for vehicles with no drivers.
- rybosworld 6y agoNot to mention the person you are replying to edited their comment after the fact (possibly as I was replying). It originally said something to the effect of "show me a company without a CEO". Which I think is significant, as I took "A" to mean "singular".
- makapuf 6y agoLet me take away your keyboard and let's see how you fare at c++ or Javascript.
- 0-_-0 6y agoIf someone dies in you family you can still write a printf statement. Without a keyboard you can't. Bad analogy.