> To be effective Signal would need to exploit the major vendors equally. Maybe they could, and that would be the problem. Cellebrite's case now raises the iss

> To be effective Signal would need to exploit the major vendors equally. Maybe they could, and that would be the problem. Cellebrite's case now raises the issue of what will happen to those decisions where Cellebrite's products were used. This can void those court decisions retroactively, which could also happen to any major vendor in the next couple of years. In any case, I doubt that this will make them stop using their products.