3 ms·
Nope. And groups don't even have security as an option. Basically they are amassing an enormous amount of personal data, chat logs, etc. while their marketing
by gaius_baltar 5y ago
Nope. And groups don't even have security as an option.
Basically they are amassing an enormous amount of personal data, chat logs, etc. while their marketing and the public opinion is still that "Telegram is secure". That's a disaster waiting for the company to be acquired or turn evil.
- eitland 5y ago> And groups don't even have security as an option. What do you even mean by this?
- gaius_baltar 5y ago> What do you even mean by this? Group chats aren't E2E encrypted and there is no way to enable it for them. In contrast, standard one-to-one chats are also insecure but there is the alternative of using secret chats with E2E encryption (however, unlike Signal chats, they don't synchronize among devices).
- eitland 5y agoOk. Then write something about that instead. As recent developments have shown there is so extremely much more to security than just E2E-encryption.