4 ms·

> Wikipedia is known for many things but not for its wisdom. I was not the one who posted a Wikipedia link. I was only responding to the fact that the Wikipedi

> Wikipedia is known for many things but not for its wisdom. I was not the one who posted a Wikipedia link. I was only responding to the fact that the Wikipedia link did not support the prior poster's claim. > Counting is counting things. For example sheeps. You don't have 0 sheeps. Either you have 1 or 2 or 3 or you don't have any. Not having any sheep is literally having 0 sheep.

BugsJustFindMe 6y ago
> Not having any sheep is literally having 0 sheep. Only if you ignore the difference between having and not having.
- Ansil849 6y ago
  How is this ignoring the difference? The statements 'I do not have any sheep' and 'I have 0 sheep' are synonymous; neither statement ignores the other.
  - hulitu 6y ago
    Those statements are synonymous in SW. Try to explain this concept to a shepperd :)