> People have to accept that in real life there is a thing called code-reviews and senior engineers are supposed to prevent such badly written code. Ah, yes, t

> People have to accept that in real life there is a thing called code-reviews and senior engineers are supposed to prevent such badly written code. Ah, yes, the "you're holding it wrong" argument, just like the article predicted. The problem with this is that your version of "real life" is significantly different from the real "real life", in which often no code-review is held, or the reviewer misses bugs.