4 ms·

You are correct. That does not however change the observation that an explanation of his charges is conspicuously absent.

• jordan0day 15y ago
  So far, it's not clear at this point this guy has actually been charged with any criminal wrongdoing. From what I've seen on the forum, here, and reddit, there doesn't appear to be a criminal charge reported. It's entirely possible that he is being held in contempt due to some civil case. What you're trying to do here is obvious, and I don't like it one bit. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty. You're trying to introduce bias, and shame on you for doing it.
  • yllus 15y ago
    I am doing no such thing - shame on you for making assumptions about another's intentions. The fact of the matter is that even if the first sentence of his message stated that he was being held on child pornography charges, I would still back his right to not have to reveal his key. That's ridiculously lazy policing. However, the omission of what his charges are from such a thorough message is extremely conspicuous. I could pretend to be a string parsing robot and only act on what the message itself contained... Or I could use my full brain like a human and make some reasonable assumptions. He's probably been accused of something pretty bad to leave it out like he did. It's funny that in then contest to appear dispassionate and just people, even in an intelligent community such as this, handicap themselves. We're not better for having done so.