> once that party has been shown to act maliciously, extra scrutiny is warranted It's nonsense that they acted maliciously. The original research was handled

> once that party has been shown to act maliciously, extra scrutiny is warranted It's nonsense that they acted maliciously. The original research was handled terribly, but it was not malicious. They intended to help, not hurt, even if they did so very poorly. Further, that is one advisor, whose name is not being dragged. Aditya's name, however, is, thanks to Greg's slanderous comments. https://twitter.com/trishalynn/status/1385410960278491137 https://twitter.com/trishalynn/status/1385410960278491137 "I am disgusted by the actions of Aditya Pakki" https://twitter.com/hedleyroos/status/1386290204298735617 https://twitter.com/hedleyroos/status/1386290204298735617 "Aditya Pakki is going to have a hard time finding employment." (this one directly retweeted Greg's post) https://twitter.com/_mackal/status/1384910754151866370 https://twitter.com/_mackal/status/1384910754151866370 "The simple fact that Aditya Pakki is so butt hurt proves this wasn't in good faith and their only reason for doing it is to shit out another hit piece. That email you quoted is fucking insane." https://twitter.com/BeardyNotes/status/1384900450059788288 https://twitter.com/BeardyNotes/status/1384900450059788288 "Sleazeballs like Aditya Pakki should be fired and disbarred from doing any "research" anywhere in the world!" https://twitter.com/seakoz/status/1384895697414148096 https://twitter.com/seakoz/status/1384895697414148096 "Aditya Pakki will forever be googleable as the guy who deliberately tried to make Linux insecure." Does that seem right to you? Are these the "consequences" you think are justified, because Aditya was trying to add legitimate patches for a tool he was working on to contribute to the kernel? Greg should publicly apologize to Aditya.