It’s standard to have terms in a contract that limits liability for any warranty to “monies actually received”. And it's standard for statutory consumer protec

It’s standard to have terms in a contract that limits liability for any warranty to “monies actually received”. And it's standard for statutory consumer protection laws to override any contractual terms and sometimes even make it illegal for vendors to suggest or imply that restrictions on the consumer's legal rights exist, at least in jurisdictions where consumer protection laws have teeth. Otherwise, every vendor (the big guy) could just require every consumer (the little guy) to sign away all their theoretical consumer rights as part of the purchase contract, and the theoretical rights would be worthless in practice.