4 ms·
Why is that? Isn't 15 mbit to 2 mbit a big enough difference in quality that you'd expect to retain all the good parts?
by StavrosK 6y ago
Why is that? Isn't 15 mbit to 2 mbit a big enough difference in quality that you'd expect to retain all the good parts?
- martinald 6y agoNot really - "raw" 1080p video is ~3gbit/sec - so going from 3000 to 15 is a huge amount of data compression. The problem is when you go from 15 to 2 in my example is that the encoder spends all the time trying to basically encode the artefacts. It really doesn't work well at all.
- StavrosK 6y agoHm, that's too bad. Is there a better way to compress already-compressed streams? I find having to do that a lot due to a use case that's not very relevant here.