> Filtering against slander seems like reasonably simple It's not. > not one that different from what they already. True, and they're pretty bad at all those

> Filtering against slander seems like reasonably simple It's not. > not one that different from what they already. True, and they're pretty bad at all those other things too. Unfortunately the societal costs of false-positives and false-negatives are not the same as Google's cost of false-positives and false-negatives.