I don't know why the above post is getting down-modded. The point is definitely a good one, even if it was stated flippantly. As has been stated in previous th

I don't know why the above post is getting down-modded. The point is definitely a good one, even if it was stated flippantly. As has been stated in previous threads on this subject, the image captures the creative work of the creator of the horn, the creator of the suit, etc. The photo is itself a mechanical transcription of a handful of other people's creative works. For the photographer to insist that his arrangement of other people's creative works is original, while somebody else's re-interpretation of the photo is not, is just wrong.