3 ms·
That's not their goal, and they do take it into account, even cautioning against using the algorithm that way for that exact reason: > MMPX is sufficiently fas
by tobr 6y ago
That's not their goal, and they do take it into account, even cautioning against using the algorithm that way for that exact reason:
> MMPX is sufficiently fast and high enough quality for run-time application in retro game/hardware emulators. Yet, we offer two cautions about using any filter in this manner. [...] true retro hardware and content was designed for cathode ray tube displays. [...] Artists created content with these characteristics in mind and often exploited them. [...] Display-independent magnification algorithms will not properly take frequency content and display filtering into account. They produce net results that may be attractive and useful, but one must acknowledge that the perceived image is not faithful to the original artistic intent.