>During a typical step-through debugging session, 90% of the time is spent on lines you are completely not interested in. Oh, did you accidentally skip the impo

>During a typical step-through debugging session, 90% of the time is spent on lines you are completely not interested in. Oh, did you accidentally skip the important point because of how tedious it was to keep spamming step-over/step-in? Better start over again. No offense, but this sounds like you just really need to learn how to use a debugger - This is in no way a "typical step-through debugging session." I've been a professional software developer for 16 years and I've never once in my life "spamm[ed] step-over/step-in" >I'm still waiting for the feature where you can conditionally stop at some breakpoint -only- if some other breakpoint/watchpoint was crossed over. This is trivial to do, place two breakpoints, disable one. When the breakpoint is hit, enable the second (and optionally, disable the first).