3 ms·
$165 billion seems quite low for nationals improvements. Seattle area is spending $54 billion just on a regional expansion of light rail and the cost had gone
by stadium 5y ago
$165 billion seems quite low for nationals improvements.
Seattle area is spending $54 billion just on a regional expansion of light rail and the cost had gone up considerably since then because of inflation and real estate pressure. https://www.constructiondive.com/news/seattle-area-light-rail-transportation-plan-busting-54b-budget/549892/ https://www.constructiondive.com/news/seattle-area-light-rai...
And is Amtrack even the right organization to lead this effort?
The inaugural run of the NW corridor high speed line resulted in derailment with 3 deaths in 2017. Positive train control could have prevented the crash bit they didn't spend on that even though it was mandated by congress. The train was going 80mph in a 30mph zone with a tight curve.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Washington_train_derailment https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Washington_train_derail...
It sounds warm and fuzzy and I would welcome high speed national rail, but the numbers and timeline don't add up.
- masklinn 5y ago> Seattle area is spending $54 billion just on a regional expansion of light rail and the cost had gone up considerably since then because of inflation and real estate pressure. https://www.constructiondive.com/news/seattle-area-light-rai https://www.constructiondive.com/news/seattle-area-light-rai... TBF light rail, and urban construction in general, is extremely expensive (due to right of way, real-estate, complicated works, …) and it doesn't really "scale out" as every urban project is its own little nugget of crap. When you're building thousands of miles of track, after a while you'll have a lot of experience which can get leveraged pretty much as-is. Not saying the plans here make sense, mind.