3 ms·
The important thing about the M1 iPad is that it’s the first time iOS is running on M1, and therefore M1 is the first chip that can rup both iOS and OSX. The o
by addicted 6y ago
The important thing about the M1 iPad is that it’s the first time iOS is running on M1, and therefore M1 is the first chip that can rup both iOS and OSX.
The obvious next step is for Apple to do a Samsung, and have iOS and OSX running on the same device, with iOS running when the device is in portable mode, and OSX running when it is docked and connected to a KVM.
At some point there won’t be a separate Mac and iDevice line. All devices will be iDevices that can run both iOS and OSX.
Apple has clearly been pushing for this for a long time. They’ve taken so many steps towards making the transition when a user switched from 1 OS to another seamless, with technologies like iCloud Drive that provides a single file system layer, universal apps that work across OS’es, handoff that allows for a smooth transition of state for an app running on OSX to the same app running on iOS and vice versa, etc.
- fred256 6y ago> The important thing about the M1 iPad is that it’s the first time iOS is running on M1, and therefore M1 is the first chip that can rup both iOS and OSX. The Apple Silicon Developer Transition Kit contained an A12Z that ran macOS, so the M1 is not the first.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 6y agoThey will never do this because it allows side stepping the app store. It's that simple.
- addicted 6y agoiOS would continue being limited to the App Store. But if that’s indeed a worry, one could foresee that the macOS version running on the iDevices are limited to App Store apps only. macOS can already be configured to do that.