I suspect I know what you are implying. However there is a difference forcing a company to do additional business in the future or forcing them to not unilater

I suspect I know what you are implying. However there is a difference forcing a company to do additional business in the future or forcing them to not unilaterally keep the money for "purchases" made in the past. Fully refunding customers (+interest) and/or explaining the decision to suspend the account in detail (perhaps even allowing consumers to correct potential problems) is not burdening Apple beyond reason. No one here seems to argue that they must allow the plaintiff to continue shopping in iTunes.