4 ms·
>You can't tell someone their car has full self driving capabilities and then expect them to listen when you tell them that they also have to be paying attentio
by matz1 5y ago
>You can't tell someone their car has full self driving capabilities and then expect them to listen when you tell them that they also have to be paying attention 100% of the time
So its Tesla fault if people doesn't listen?
- lolinder 5y agoNot entirely, but they absolutely share a portion of the blame. Their marketing campaign clearly wants people to believe that these vehicles can drive themselves. They're trying to create that belief in people. That makes them accountable when some subset actually do believe what they've been saying.
- matz1 5y agoTo create believe is basically the goal of every marketing campaign of any kind. Thats expected and reasonable.
- lolinder 5y agoDeceptive advertising is a crime. If you set out to create a belief that is untrue, you're already criminally liable. If the people who believe what you said end up getting killed...
- matz1 5y agoI disagree that its deceptive. Technically yes the car can drive itself albeit not perfect. Tesla never claim it can drive perfectly either.
- femiagbabiaka 5y agoThey claim close to level 5 in public, claim level 2 to regulators. Deceptive or not?
- matz1 5y agoIts not deceptive/contradictory, technically, close to level 5 can be level 2.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- seoaeu 5y agoYes, they have some of the blame. For exactly the same reason that a car company can't remove the airbags and just tell their customers "don't crash!"
- matz1 5y agoCar company can't do that because there are law to prevent that. What law tesla broke in this case?