4 ms·
Weirdly, the “private companies can do what they want” angle seems pretty unpopular here.
by read_if_gay_ 5y ago
Weirdly, the “private companies can do what they want” angle seems pretty unpopular here.
- Vespasian 5y agoI suspect I know what you are implying. However there is a difference forcing a company to do additional business in the future or forcing them to not unilaterally keep the money for "purchases" made in the past. Fully refunding customers (+interest) and/or explaining the decision to suspend the account in detail (perhaps even allowing consumers to correct potential problems) is not burdening Apple beyond reason. No one here seems to argue that they must allow the plaintiff to continue shopping in iTunes.
- anaganisk 5y agoWhich is bound by laws too.