6 ms·
> It's actually more than that: when there are lots of sub-comments, it helps to see the immediate "mother" of the comment node you're reading. Imagine a commen
by aome510 5y ago
> It's actually more than that: when there are lots of sub-comments, it helps to see the immediate "mother" of the comment node you're reading. Imagine a comment that has two replies, and the first reply has dozens and dozens of sub-replies and sub-sub-replies, which typically veer into all sorts of adjacent issues. By the time I'm done with the 1st reply and its dozens and dozens of sub-replies, it is often unclear what the initial comment (or even topic) was. It is then very helpful to be able to glance back up to the initial comment across the now-collapsed first reply and its dozens and dozens of sub-replies, before reading reply #2. Simply navigating to reply #2 doesn't give you that.
I think I get what you mean. Instead of adding 3 different collapse commands, WDYT about adding one command to collapse the current comment and one command to move up to the parent comment?
> I mean this page of the HN site: https://news.ycombinator.com/active https://news.ycombinator.com/active . It has the currently actively discussed stories, and is a great way to catch up after not reading HN for a day or two. A kind of intermediate step between best ( https://news.ycombinator.com/best https://news.ycombinator.com/best ) and the homepage.
Interesting, I don't know `/best` and `/active` exist. `/best` seems to be a list of stories (up to past 4 days) sorted by `points`.
`/active`, on the other hand, and `/news` as well are quite weird. I don't really know the algorithm behind the order of sorting submissions in those.
In the meantime, I guess open the `Story View - All stories` with `sort_by=popularity` and `time_range=past 24 hours` might do the job.
- sm1ch 5y ago> WDYT about adding one command to collapse the current comment and one command to move up to the parent comment? That would be great! (Or alternatively a single command that does both of these, which was mostly my option (ii) in the initial comment).