3 ms·
Reading the article it seems that is now allowed to “attack” and drive into a crowd. That seems to be something entirely different from letting the car roll an
by spockz 6y ago
Reading the article it seems that is now allowed to “attack” and drive into a crowd.
That seems to be something entirely different from letting the car roll and trying to get away from a crowd which is the self-defense from your points.
- SamReidHughes 6y agoYou are in fact not allowed to "attack" a crowd.
- spockz 6y agoThat is great to hear. But the article doesn’t make that abundantly clear imho.
- redis_mlc 6y agoNope, if a mob surrounds you, that law lets you drive over them. Watch some of last summer's riots to understand what they're talking about. Police cars had to run over people to escape the rioters after being surrounded. There is nothing cute or admirable about the BLM and antifa riots. The Florida law just clarifies that you can affirmatively defend yourself.
- spockz 6y agoIt might be that the Florida law allows for the more self defence. But the linked article is speaking of attacking and driving “into” a crowd. Into means that you are not part of it. So all I’m saying is that I find the article confusing.