3 ms·
I agree with the approach you’ve outlined. I also empathize with the plight of the researchers — Linux is a bit different than normal Red Team engagements, in
by pcl 5y ago
I agree with the approach you’ve outlined.
I also empathize with the plight of the researchers — Linux is a bit different than normal Red Team engagements, in that a normal organization has a hunch of administrative / management layers who typically do not participate in the operations of the system being tested. A VP of engineering at a medium to large company is unlikely to be committing code, much less maintaining the build pipeline etc.
This is not the case with Linux. The people “at the top” are also reviewers, and so it’s pretty likely that notifying them will result in a change of behavior.
I wonder if there is some way to build some sort of Red Team consent “blind trust” organization, such that willing open source projects could agree to responsible attacks, and the attackers could register their work (including disclosure / mitigation plans) with the blind trust ahead of time.
- neatze 5y agoWhy do you think there will be any change in behavior ? It is not like community members are not for look out for bad commits on every new commit from most committers any way, since at least 2003, I think substantially earlier.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]