> primary sources at many points throughout history That's like debunking alchemy, then claiming you've disproven chemistry. Do those primary sources prove tha

> primary sources at many points throughout history That's like debunking alchemy, then claiming you've disproven chemistry. Do those primary sources prove that Europeans are not, on average, more closely related to other Europeans, than to other peoples? Do they make clusters on genetic distance maps [1,2] go away? [1] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320036658/figure/fig4/AS:542940411817984@1506458489974/Reconstruction-of-population-structure-of-the-1000-Genomes-Project-data-set-A.png https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320036658/figure/fi... [2] https://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Ish7688voT0/TEdgg08HnTI/AAAAAAAACgg/SHVjodGXK8g/s1600/eurasian-pca.jpg https://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Ish7688voT0/TEdgg08HnTI/AAAAAAAAC...