I understood your comment just fine. Yes you are the one gatekeeping. No, people still don't owe you high quality code. If a repo claims to be something that i

I understood your comment just fine. Yes you are the one gatekeeping. No, people still don't owe you high quality code. If a repo claims to be something that it isn't, you can complain (to the extent that it's polite and that your complaint might well be ignored regardless). Better yet would be to contribute. The last repository whose quality-to-claimed-usefulness ratio was bad enough that it got me to complain, I now maintain. Be the change you want to see, instead of muttering about man-hours.