3 ms·
when digging though some of the IPs, i came across 22.0.0.0/8, which if you look at the DNS tab of bgp.he.net (https://bgp.he.net/net/22.0.0.0/8#_dns https://bg
by tiernano 5y ago
when digging though some of the IPs, i came across 22.0.0.0/8, which if you look at the DNS tab of bgp.he.net (https://bgp.he.net/net/22.0.0.0/8#_dns https://bgp.he.net/net/22.0.0.0/8#_dns) shows a LOT of people are "using" those IPs... which means a LOT of people wont be happy that their sites, email, dns, etc, are now essentially being blackholed... for me (I run AS204994), the traffic hits Frankfurt (i peer with HE there) goes over their network though Paris, then to Ashburn and then is blackholed... gone after that... wondering how much traffic is being seen by he.net with this...
- icedchai 5y agoIf they're using them for internal networks, they'll (probably) work just like they did before. It's likely many folks are using these as like private RFC-1918 addresses.
- tiernano 5y agoIf they are private, which they could be, I wonder why they are showing up in public on there... Also, ripe.net has ripe stats... Checked a few of the ranges and seen people other than the dod and these lads announcing the range...
- icedchai 5y agoAnyone can put an address in their DNS records, whether it's "theirs" or not. I have several records with 192.168.0.0/16 IPs. The DNS can be seen publicly but obviously they don't route. It's the same thing. Other folks are definitely using those DoD addresses. For example, I see a bunch being announced by AS23352 / Server Central: https://bgp.he.net/AS23352#_prefixes https://bgp.he.net/AS23352#_prefixes