4 ms·
Nokia appears to unintentionally sow fear, uncertainty and doubt about its own products. Elop seems determined to walk in Adam Osbourne's footsteps: http://en
by raganwald 15y ago
Nokia appears to unintentionally sow fear, uncertainty and doubt about its own products.
Elop seems determined to walk in Adam Osbourne's footsteps:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osborne_effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osborne_effect
Given his clear commitment to WP7 at all costs, what would motivate anyone to buy an N9, much less develop for its "platform?"
The two top OS players in the market, Google and Apple, each have exactly one platform they push (Android and iOS respectively). If neither of those titans thinks it's prudent to support two entirely different platforms, how am I to reconcile myself with the idea that Nokia can successfully attack the market on two separate fronts?
- kenjackson 15y agoIt's possible they have a contractual obligation to Intel to release a Meego phone this year. Who knows. But clearly upper management is lukewarm on it.
- Lewisham 15y agoYeah, it's clear that if Elop had his way, the N9 wouldn't be released at all. Either there's an external contract, or there's some internal promise he made to board members/shareholders. This smells a lot like the Kin launch just to meet a contractual obligation between MS and Verizon.
- raganwald 15y agoThe launch of a doomed product just to meet a contractual obligation--if that's what it is--is going to do a lot for Nokia's relationship with carriers in the future. Ouch.
- pessimizer 15y agoI agree with the obligation theory, because if the N9 looks really good to reviewers (whether it sells or not), it will be used as a counterpoint in any future bad or even neutral reviews of their first few W7 releases as an indictment of management competence. What makes that even more likely is that reviewers are geekier than the general population, just as Maemo/Meego is geekier than W7. So even an equivalent quality of experience is likely to create bad buzz in the shadow of a well reviewed N9. If I were the management, I would be hostile to it and do whatever I could to bury it. We know from history that Nokia can bury their own phones, but I have no idea if they can do it on purpose:) Of course, my hope as a geeky N900 owner is that the N9 catches on, Nokia pivots to releasing Meego/Harmattan phones along with W7 phones, and starts putting money into Meego again until it's ready for primetime. I don't think it's too likely, though, without a leadership change.
- barista 15y agoI wish it wasn't released. A Contractual obligation seems likely. Remember Microsofts failed Kin Phone? This looks linda similar. Mocrosoft lost a lot of PR points for releasing kin and then cancelling it in a few days. Elop doesn't seem to have learnt from that. At this time the thing nokia needs the least is some loss of face value and credibility.
- beagle3 15y ago> Elop seems determined to walk in Adam Osbourne's footsteps: Rick Belluzzo's footsteps are a better comparison: (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Belluzzo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Belluzzo for more); He killed HP's processor business (giving it to Intel for free), then destroyed SGI (killing MIPS and IRIX in the process). The main beneficiary in all three cases (Nokia, SGI, HP) is actually Microsoft - where Belluzzo got a job later, and I'm sure Elop will go back to later to collect his reward -- after all, he sold Nokia to MS for $1B, way below market price.
- raganwald 15y agoOr Ray Noorda: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novell#Beyond_NetWare http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novell#Beyond_NetWare Bought Unix Systems Laboratories, Wordperfect, Quattro Pro, and DR DOS, and squandered them, accelerating Microsoft's dominance of PC operating systems and office software.