I invite you to mitigate your arrogance, your argument involves hijacking the narrative and waving a paper around. You don't make any other effort. By the way,

I invite you to mitigate your arrogance, your argument involves hijacking the narrative and waving a paper around. You don't make any other effort. By the way, it was not about sex trafficking as much as it was about legalizing prostitution. Yes, the former is a problem but it does not negate the current problems sex workers are facing. There are more prostitutes who ARE NOT trafficked, they are being abused and silenced by current legislation. Just because of a possible increase in sex trafficking we should not shut down a whole discourse in changing these people's situation. I invite you to swallow your pride and learn to be mindful about the conclusions you draw from these studies. They're not set into stone and are limited to their scope; the quality of the data and a possible hidden intent is also not automatically removed from consideration. Not at all am I saying studies are not valuable but they should not be taken as complete truth, they're just a view from a particular angle. If you want to read about benefits of legalizing prostitution you're free to read it yourself, I'm not going to bother to extract excerpts for you. I've read some of your comments and you do come off as an intelligent fella but a bit on the arrogant side. Without any expectation I'm telling it does take some points off and unchecked may become a largerissue down the line. Enjoy your weekend https://harvardcrcl.org/to-protect-women-legalize-prostitution/ https://harvardcrcl.org/to-protect-women-legalize-prostituti...