> Ultimately you’re expressing an anti-simplicity sentiment I disagree. First, making a language simple doesn’t make programs simpler, and often does the oppos

> Ultimately you’re expressing an anti-simplicity sentiment I disagree. First, making a language simple doesn’t make programs simpler, and often does the opposite. I’m also not sure I buy the idea that Go is actually simple. It lacks a lot of features, but that’s not the same as being simple. I mean, it supports runtime reflection, which seems more complicated than features like traits or generics. And code using reflection is never simple.