In a recent HN thread, someone correctly stated that Mozilla and Google are working the browser market like a tag team, not like competitors. In accordance with

In a recent HN thread, someone correctly stated that Mozilla and Google are working the browser market like a tag team, not like competitors. In accordance with that view, I think it would have been more sensible for Mozilla to stay with their previous versioning scheme, and not call something 5.0 which really should have been 4.1, thus making a complementary offer to the user base, instead of doing it exactly like Chrome.