Geekbench 5 runs the same tests on both platforms, and always did. What you say as heavily based for Arm comes with no evidence. > The M1 is also ran at much m

Geekbench 5 runs the same tests on both platforms, and always did. What you say as heavily based for Arm comes with no evidence. > The M1 is also ran at much more than 15W in some models. Nope, it's the same M1 for both, same voltage/frequency curves and top clocks. It's the whole point of having a chip that's named the same. ' No modern laptop CPU has a headline power use number. They all try to use the headroom that they've been given. Cinebench is very far from being the end-all of benchmarking that you say it is here. And there are far more optimised renderers around if you want to benchmark that. (RTX makes the matter moot nowadays anyway) It does not use AVX-512, or older AVX levels much for that matter, for a workload that is SIMD-friendly. For Arm, they leave lots of perf on the table too. (Cinebench uses Intel's Embree renderer, with AVX-512 disabled) Geekbench 5 is designed to be a composite index of multiple benchmarks to be more realistic to some extent than using just one. You can also access to the scores of the subtests too.