3 ms·
16% of candidates to Harvard were accepted in 1992, this year that has dropped to 4%. So even if there is a problem with the selection criteria it’s likely marg
by Traster 6y ago
16% of candidates to Harvard were accepted in 1992, this year that has dropped to 4%. So even if there is a problem with the selection criteria it’s likely marginal compared to the real issue which is the refusal of the top schools to actually meet demand despite clearly having the funds to do so.
- anonymoushn 6y agoHow many schools did each candidate apply to in 1992 and in 2021?
- jollybean 5y ago" refusal of the top schools to actually meet demand " Doesn't work that way. Every student probably wants to go to Harvard, demand is unlimited. If they lowered the standards for example, there would be more applicants. The number of applicants varies by all sorts of factors. Students probably have started applying to far more schools than otherwise. There are more total uni students, even if the number of seats across america has grown commensurate, the number of applications to Harvard will still go up. Finally, Harvard probably wouldn't be Harvard if it were 10x bigger, moreover, they have no obligation to do so. They can do as they please, there are tons of good schools in America. This is not the issue we face with selectivity and race/class/gender, that's a lot harder and it's a problem they cannot avoid.