4 ms·
The article makes the observation that "loved languages don't have legacy codebases". Also, using Ruby as an example, it postulates that "once a language has en
by mavelikara 6y ago
The article makes the observation that "loved languages don't have legacy codebases". Also, using Ruby as an example, it postulates that "once a language has enough legacy codebases, it stops being a loved language".
- meetups323 6y agoExcept it mentions C# as a loved language, which far up there in terms of legacy/enterprise-y.
- Gibbon1 6y agoI wonder what the 'ugh factor' is for old C# code bases vs those in other languages.
- mavelikara 6y agoI suspect there are two C#s in play here - the original C# in which many legacy/enterprise-y codebases are written, and the C# on .NET Core which is a fairly new ecosystem.