3 ms·
You're assuming they're opposed to human testing, so you see the first statement as, "animals are people too" instead of "humans are just animals." From there,
by Aeronwen 5y ago
You're assuming they're opposed to human testing, so you see the first statement as, "animals are people too" instead of "humans are just animals."
From there, the second statement a solution to a legal problem they have, and not the moral one they don't have.
- caconym_ 5y ago> so you see the first statement as, "animals are people too" instead of "humans are just animals." You're assuming a lot yourself by telling me how I interpret the point about the line between humans and animals, and (in fact) you have assumed incorrectly. The article includes a quote about how they intend to follow "all the ethical, legal, and social guidelines in place". So I don't think the point I made about their stance being contradictory is way off base. Of course, they could actually be aliens from the planet Omicron Persei 8 with zero genuine concern for human or animal life. Or whatever.