3 ms·
Amarok was awesome! I really liked the "moodbar" addon that converted each audio track into a colorful 1D strip, underneath the progress indicator. Ah, looks l
by bqmjjx0kac 6y ago
Amarok was awesome! I really liked the "moodbar" addon that converted each audio track into a colorful 1D strip, underneath the progress indicator.
Ah, looks like it's a project in its own right, but the Wikipedia page has an Amarok screenshot.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moodbar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moodbar
- pxc 6y agoI loved Amarok for years, including after the 2.0 rewrite. It was my favorite as long as the main way I listened to music was a collection of local files, despite flirtations with other cool projects like MPD, Subsonic, Ampache, etc. Documentation from the Exaile project (another music player inspired by Amarok!) indicates that while the Amarok developers did not invent the moodbar, their implementation is the one we know and love (which was packaged as the standalone `moodbar` CLI program that could be used to generate moodbars that other players would also read): https://github.com/exaile/moodbar https://github.com/exaile/moodbar For me, Amarok was so good that it gave 13-year-old me enough reason to switch operating systems for daily use. The moodbar was definitely cool, and I remember being impressed that I could actually identify different sections of songs I knew with it. The feature that really got me was the automatic lyrics fetching and other contextual information. I listened to music kinda obsessively, and I loved being able to instantly see the lyrics and really learn a song right away.
- KozmoNau7 6y agoAmarok really lost me with the 2.0 redesign. I switched to Clementine instead, which carries on the Amarok 1.x design. Lately development on Clementine has been lagging a bit, so I'm using a fork called Strawberry. The Amarok 1.x interface is closely tied with Quod Libet as my favorite audio library/player, but QL is significantly less user-friendly, thanks to its extensive flexibility.