3 ms·

> I understand the system plenty, the difference is I look at it objectively, and you're not. You drank the kool-aid and got swept away. That's not an argument

> I understand the system plenty, the difference is I look at it objectively, and you're not. You drank the kool-aid and got swept away. That's not an argument or information of any kind. Instead of confronting anything I said, your whole post is a text book gish gallop - a bunch of nonsense arguments about things you are hallucinating since everything you said so far has been wildly contradicted. No mention of the 100 million cryptocurrency users after you said there were none. No mention of all the use cases after you said there were none. No mention of your claim of 'cheap because they aren't popular' being completely and obviously false. No mention of all the bank hacks after you said it doesn't happen with traditional currencies. No mention of the sources I gave to back up what I said while you repeat what you want to be true with no evidence. Instead you forget all the things you said that were not true at all and move on to venting about some sort of tangents. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop > ACH is a great example. It's deprecated Then why does the thing you linked use it? > They're not actually better at anything than a classical implementation. You can come up with all the "you just don't understand" BS you want (with nothing to back it up) but the truth is there is no other way you could send me money in an hour without identifying information and a third party. I'm sure you will purposely miss the point and say "but I don't want too" instead of confronting that this is obviously not true.

arcticbull 6y ago
> You can come up with all the "you just don't understand" BS you want (with nothing to back it up) Just replying in kind to you haha. In fact everything I said had basis, and is factually accurate, even if you choose to pretend otherwise. And of course no reply to any substantiation points I raised just complaining about other points I raised but set aside due to the conversation lacking focus.
- CyberDildonics 6y ago
  What did you back up exactly? You said no one uses cryptocurrency, I linked you an article with its own sources saying there are over 100 million users. You said cheap transactions are because no one uses them, I linked you a graph of actual transactions showing bitcoin cash has more transactions than regular bitcoin even though it has 1/600th the transaction cost and I explained why. I told you how monero dynamic block size work, which is something you can verify if some day you want to learn. You there are no uses, I pointed out multiple uses and you didn't contradict any. You just said you personally didn't want them. You said you could do anything with some money transfer service, I pointed out the actual numbers which involve 3-4 business day transactions and a cost of $7.50 to RECIEVE a wire transfer. Meanwhile you keep making assertions and thinking that repeating them is the same as explaining them. Then you ignore everything that directly contradicts what you say to try to talk about nonsense that has no relevance, then you say 'there is a lack of focus'. This is what people do when they have their conclusions picked out ahead of time and are desperate to get their nonsense validated. It is everything people hate about political discourse - no reality, no sources, no evidence, no data and no accountability when someone lies.

arcticbull 6y ago

> You can come up with all the "you just don't understand" BS you want (with nothing to back it up) Just replying in kind to you haha. In fact everything I said had basis, and is factually accurate, even if you choose to pretend otherwise. And of course no reply to any substantiation points I raised just complaining about other points I raised but set aside due to the conversation lacking focus.

CyberDildonics 6y ago
What did you back up exactly? You said no one uses cryptocurrency, I linked you an article with its own sources saying there are over 100 million users. You said cheap transactions are because no one uses them, I linked you a graph of actual transactions showing bitcoin cash has more transactions than regular bitcoin even though it has 1/600th the transaction cost and I explained why. I told you how monero dynamic block size work, which is something you can verify if some day you want to learn. You there are no uses, I pointed out multiple uses and you didn't contradict any. You just said you personally didn't want them. You said you could do anything with some money transfer service, I pointed out the actual numbers which involve 3-4 business day transactions and a cost of $7.50 to RECIEVE a wire transfer. Meanwhile you keep making assertions and thinking that repeating them is the same as explaining them. Then you ignore everything that directly contradicts what you say to try to talk about nonsense that has no relevance, then you say 'there is a lack of focus'. This is what people do when they have their conclusions picked out ahead of time and are desperate to get their nonsense validated. It is everything people hate about political discourse - no reality, no sources, no evidence, no data and no accountability when someone lies.