2 ms·
> PUC Lua because it's the reference. I won't go to the debate LuaJIT vs PUC Lua. Maybe a LuaJIT version could be released too in the future Don't mean to deba
by moonchild 6y ago
> PUC Lua because it's the reference. I won't go to the debate LuaJIT vs PUC Lua. Maybe a LuaJIT version could be released too in the future
Don't mean to debate, and I certainly wasn't criticizing the choice. I just thought it was unusual, since luajit makes interop with native code a much stronger focus than puc lua.
- _samt_ 6y agoLuaRT main goal is to facilitate access to the Windows operating system functionalities without the need for C interoperability (no need for binary modules or FFI layers), hence the choice for PUC Lua :)